<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fame (1980), Fame (2009), and Fame!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ajchristian.org/2009/06/03/film-fame-1980-fame-2009-and-fame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2009/06/03/film-fame-1980-fame-2009-and-fame/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:18:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brilliance of Cute: &#8216;Babies&#8217; Follows &#8216;March of the Penguins,&#8217; LOLCats, YouTube &#171; Televisual</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2009/06/03/film-fame-1980-fame-2009-and-fame/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Brilliance of Cute: &#8216;Babies&#8217; Follows &#8216;March of the Penguins,&#8217; LOLCats, YouTube &#171; Televisual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=378#comment-101</guid>
		<description>[...] been wrong before about predicting the success of films. One movie might seem right on time and yet be five minutes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] been wrong before about predicting the success of films. One movie might seem right on time and yet be five minutes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WP Themes</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2009/06/03/film-fame-1980-fame-2009-and-fame/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>WP Themes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 15:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=378#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Genial post and this post helped me alot in my college assignement. Thanks you for your information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Genial post and this post helped me alot in my college assignement. Thanks you for your information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Miller, of &#8220;Fame&#8221; Fame, Decries Fame Today &#171; Televisual</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2009/06/03/film-fame-1980-fame-2009-and-fame/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Miller, of &#8220;Fame&#8221; Fame, Decries Fame Today &#171; Televisual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=378#comment-99</guid>
		<description>[...] when Barry Miller, known for his star-turn as Ralph Garcy in the original Fame (1980), starting commenting anonymously on my blog, I wouldn&#8217;t bat an [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] when Barry Miller, known for his star-turn as Ralph Garcy in the original Fame (1980), starting commenting anonymously on my blog, I wouldn&#8217;t bat an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Lagoon</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2009/06/03/film-fame-1980-fame-2009-and-fame/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Lagoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=378#comment-98</guid>
		<description>One more thing....Parker wanted the film. through my &quot;Ralph Garcy&quot; character, to relfect upon the then-recent tragic suicide of superstar comedian and teen idol Freddie Prinze that had shocked Hollywood and the nation...it was the main motif and &quot;raison d&#039; etre&quot; of the whole film&#039;s subtext....&quot;what profit a man if he gains the whole world and loses his soul?&quot;

Follow this main character, audience,  with his starry-eyed and idealistic aspirations and his tragic idol by his side as his guiding light...why, dear audience, is he suddenly lost and going down the same path?

What does this say about one&#039;s self-worth versus the worth of public favor?

What does it say about the values of our culture?

What does it say ABOUT YOU?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing&#8230;.Parker wanted the film. through my &#8220;Ralph Garcy&#8221; character, to relfect upon the then-recent tragic suicide of superstar comedian and teen idol Freddie Prinze that had shocked Hollywood and the nation&#8230;it was the main motif and &#8220;raison d&#8217; etre&#8221; of the whole film&#8217;s subtext&#8230;.&#8221;what profit a man if he gains the whole world and loses his soul?&#8221;</p>
<p>Follow this main character, audience,  with his starry-eyed and idealistic aspirations and his tragic idol by his side as his guiding light&#8230;why, dear audience, is he suddenly lost and going down the same path?</p>
<p>What does this say about one&#8217;s self-worth versus the worth of public favor?</p>
<p>What does it say about the values of our culture?</p>
<p>What does it say ABOUT YOU?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Lagoon</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2009/06/03/film-fame-1980-fame-2009-and-fame/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Lagoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 21:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=378#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Christian,

I am who I say I am. I responded to your website because I liked your take...drugs and pornography, glamour and failure and dark unshiny 1970&#039;s things, indeed.

You must understand this: the remake was no mere attempt at homage, or a desperate attempt by a failing studio to reap profits off it&#039;s back catalogue. It was part of a much bigger and much more sinister agenda of revisionist propaganda that had been going on with the film specifically through much of the Reagan/Bush Years and continues to flourish all across the board these days with the majority of mainstream Hollywood output..:hence the non-stop proliferation of remakes, do-overs, and &quot;inspired-bys&quot;. It is a fact, probably not known by many, that a controversial and much-derided organization backed by Christian fundamentalists with connections in the film industry produced and finallcially backed a major release in 2004 called &quot;Raise Your Voice&quot; which was unquestionably an attempt to recast a &quot;Fame&quot;-like scenario in the strictest pro-religious, pro-aspirational , and pro-&quot;family values&quot; terms.

Fame 09 was just the more covert mulit-ethnic version if it.

As to my career...a Tony Award, leading roles with Coppola and Scorsese, the starring role in 1977&#039;s Saturday Night Fever...this was hardly the stuff of anonymity.

I just did it in a world without YouTube and MySpace....where Warhols &quot;fifteen minutes of fame&quot; was considered an insult and not a blueprint.

I became an actor in a galaxy long ago and far away...where to be an artist, and not a celebrity, was the greatest of dreams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Christian,</p>
<p>I am who I say I am. I responded to your website because I liked your take&#8230;drugs and pornography, glamour and failure and dark unshiny 1970&#8242;s things, indeed.</p>
<p>You must understand this: the remake was no mere attempt at homage, or a desperate attempt by a failing studio to reap profits off it&#8217;s back catalogue. It was part of a much bigger and much more sinister agenda of revisionist propaganda that had been going on with the film specifically through much of the Reagan/Bush Years and continues to flourish all across the board these days with the majority of mainstream Hollywood output..:hence the non-stop proliferation of remakes, do-overs, and &#8220;inspired-bys&#8221;. It is a fact, probably not known by many, that a controversial and much-derided organization backed by Christian fundamentalists with connections in the film industry produced and finallcially backed a major release in 2004 called &#8220;Raise Your Voice&#8221; which was unquestionably an attempt to recast a &#8220;Fame&#8221;-like scenario in the strictest pro-religious, pro-aspirational , and pro-&#8221;family values&#8221; terms.</p>
<p>Fame 09 was just the more covert mulit-ethnic version if it.</p>
<p>As to my career&#8230;a Tony Award, leading roles with Coppola and Scorsese, the starring role in 1977&#8242;s Saturday Night Fever&#8230;this was hardly the stuff of anonymity.</p>
<p>I just did it in a world without YouTube and MySpace&#8230;.where Warhols &#8220;fifteen minutes of fame&#8221; was considered an insult and not a blueprint.</p>
<p>I became an actor in a galaxy long ago and far away&#8230;where to be an artist, and not a celebrity, was the greatest of dreams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aymar Jean Christian</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2009/06/03/film-fame-1980-fame-2009-and-fame/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Aymar Jean Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=378#comment-96</guid>
		<description>If this is the real Barry Miller, then thank you for your informed insight! I think what the Fame remake tells us is that the original was one of a kind and very much a product of its time and place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is the real Barry Miller, then thank you for your informed insight! I think what the Fame remake tells us is that the original was one of a kind and very much a product of its time and place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Lagoon</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2009/06/03/film-fame-1980-fame-2009-and-fame/comment-page-1/#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Lagoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=378#comment-95</guid>
		<description>By the way, would anybody like to buy some Sephora &quot;Fame&quot; lip gloss in &quot;Starbright Pink&quot; or &quot;Superstar Red&quot;. or some sparkly LG Washers and Dryers cheap?

Really, really, really, really cheap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, would anybody like to buy some Sephora &#8220;Fame&#8221; lip gloss in &#8220;Starbright Pink&#8221; or &#8220;Superstar Red&#8221;. or some sparkly LG Washers and Dryers cheap?</p>
<p>Really, really, really, really cheap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Lagoon</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2009/06/03/film-fame-1980-fame-2009-and-fame/comment-page-1/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Lagoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=378#comment-94</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Christian,

MGM got exactly what they deserved. Let it stand as a testament to the fact that unlike the admonishment of the drama teacher in the remake who boldly proclaimed that there is no room for anger in the theatre, that it was precisely that anger that made the 1980 film a classic and the censorial removal of it within the 2009 version that doomed it to failure.

Barry Miller

AKA RALPH GARCY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Christian,</p>
<p>MGM got exactly what they deserved. Let it stand as a testament to the fact that unlike the admonishment of the drama teacher in the remake who boldly proclaimed that there is no room for anger in the theatre, that it was precisely that anger that made the 1980 film a classic and the censorial removal of it within the 2009 version that doomed it to failure.</p>
<p>Barry Miller</p>
<p>AKA RALPH GARCY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MEDIA UPDATE: Watching &#171; TELEVISUAL, a blog by Aymar Jean Christian</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2009/06/03/film-fame-1980-fame-2009-and-fame/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>MEDIA UPDATE: Watching &#171; TELEVISUAL, a blog by Aymar Jean Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 19:04:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=378#comment-93</guid>
		<description>[...]  Tags: media update, watching trackback  UPDATE: For my take on the new Fame (2009), please see this post: FILM: Fame (1980), Fame (2009), [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Tags: media update, watching trackback  UPDATE: For my take on the new Fame (2009), please see this post: FILM: Fame (1980), Fame (2009), [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny Lagoon</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2009/06/03/film-fame-1980-fame-2009-and-fame/comment-page-1/#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny Lagoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=378#comment-92</guid>
		<description>&quot;For thirty strangely obsessive years, Hollywood began producing imitative versions of the 1980 Alan Parker original, whose subsequent puffed-up aspirational agendas were an attempt to rebuke every single element of a commercially successful product that in the most direct and compellingly dramatic way spoke to it&#039;s audience about the false spectacle and lethally toxic consequences of the very same Hollywood system that had made it....a voluptuous anomoly only afforded to that generation of young people who existed in that brief moment of time before the rise of Reagan and the age of the computer&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;For thirty strangely obsessive years, Hollywood began producing imitative versions of the 1980 Alan Parker original, whose subsequent puffed-up aspirational agendas were an attempt to rebuke every single element of a commercially successful product that in the most direct and compellingly dramatic way spoke to it&#8217;s audience about the false spectacle and lethally toxic consequences of the very same Hollywood system that had made it&#8230;.a voluptuous anomoly only afforded to that generation of young people who existed in that brief moment of time before the rise of Reagan and the age of the computer&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
