<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Has Showtime Abandoned Gays? (Death of the &#8220;Gay Show,&#8221; Part II)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.ajchristian.org/2010/01/19/why-has-showtime-abandoned-gays-death-of-the-gay-show-part-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2010/01/19/why-has-showtime-abandoned-gays-death-of-the-gay-show-part-ii/</link>
	<description>Essays and News on Web Series, TV, Film</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2010/01/19/why-has-showtime-abandoned-gays-death-of-the-gay-show-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-78533</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=1726#comment-78533</guid>
		<description>Very interesting posts. As a young, gay man in Germany I have profited a lot from seeing the explicit series &quot;Queer as Folk&quot;. I wonder in general what the gay community can do to make it more interesting for networks (or producers) to make gay shows (movies).

At the end of the day it simply has to be financially interesting. It would e.g. be good if people buy the DVDs instead of just watching the shows on youtube. The more money they make, the more likely they will be to produce new show...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting posts. As a young, gay man in Germany I have profited a lot from seeing the explicit series &#8220;Queer as Folk&#8221;. I wonder in general what the gay community can do to make it more interesting for networks (or producers) to make gay shows (movies).</p>
<p>At the end of the day it simply has to be financially interesting. It would e.g. be good if people buy the DVDs instead of just watching the shows on youtube. The more money they make, the more likely they will be to produce new show&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In Adult Content, Does Diversity Sell? &#171; Televisual</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2010/01/19/why-has-showtime-abandoned-gays-death-of-the-gay-show-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>In Adult Content, Does Diversity Sell? &#171; Televisual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 04:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=1726#comment-396</guid>
		<description>[...] made its mark by being the only network to show explicit gay content, and, while it&#8217;s largely abandoned that strategy, it still offers a strong slate of shows geared toward women, offering actresses like Edie Falco [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] made its mark by being the only network to show explicit gay content, and, while it&#8217;s largely abandoned that strategy, it still offers a strong slate of shows geared toward women, offering actresses like Edie Falco [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: siddrick</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2010/01/19/why-has-showtime-abandoned-gays-death-of-the-gay-show-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>siddrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=1726#comment-395</guid>
		<description>God Bless You</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God Bless You</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aymar Jean Christian</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2010/01/19/why-has-showtime-abandoned-gays-death-of-the-gay-show-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Aymar Jean Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=1726#comment-394</guid>
		<description>True!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: List of Gay and Lesbian Web Series Up! &#171; Televisual</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2010/01/19/why-has-showtime-abandoned-gays-death-of-the-gay-show-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>List of Gay and Lesbian Web Series Up! &#171; Televisual</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=1726#comment-393</guid>
		<description>[...] as such, and these series are looking to fill a void with the loss of explicitly gay shows like Showtime&#8217;s The L Word and Noah&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as such, and these series are looking to fill a void with the loss of explicitly gay shows like Showtime&#8217;s The L Word and Noah&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: notesofasexiststayathomefather</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2010/01/19/why-has-showtime-abandoned-gays-death-of-the-gay-show-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>notesofasexiststayathomefather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=1726#comment-392</guid>
		<description>LESBIAN DOUBLE STANDARD: This week we had in-laws over for dinner. Inspired by Chuck we made our own pizzas, including a goat cheese, roasted butternut squash, arugula, olive oil pie…yum! yum! Anyway, over dinner conversation my wife was telling Grandma &amp; Grandpa about how we got a free subscription to Showtime, and that we’re recording ‘The L Word‘, a drama about lesbians. My wife observed: “How come we hear about women who are sick of men and start dating other women? But we never hear a man say, ‘I’m sick of women! I think I’ll start dating men!’”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LESBIAN DOUBLE STANDARD: This week we had in-laws over for dinner. Inspired by Chuck we made our own pizzas, including a goat cheese, roasted butternut squash, arugula, olive oil pie…yum! yum! Anyway, over dinner conversation my wife was telling Grandma &amp; Grandpa about how we got a free subscription to Showtime, and that we’re recording ‘The L Word‘, a drama about lesbians. My wife observed: “How come we hear about women who are sick of men and start dating other women? But we never hear a man say, ‘I’m sick of women! I think I’ll start dating men!’”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aymar Jean Christian</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2010/01/19/why-has-showtime-abandoned-gays-death-of-the-gay-show-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-391</link>
		<dc:creator>Aymar Jean Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 04:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=1726#comment-391</guid>
		<description>Good question! I think a show like &lt;em&gt;HawthoRNe&lt;/em&gt; provides a good example, a show that&#039;s essentially a genre series (medical drama), but with a lead that&#039;s a little &quot;different.&quot; Sci-fi is good at this, and I could imagine a doctor or lawyer show with a gay lead. Each episode would focus on a medical or legal problem, and the lead &quot;just happens to be gay.&quot; Of course sexuality would -- and should! -- come up, but the point is that you would identify with the character for other reasons (they&#039;re empathetic, good at their jobs, fight for the little guy, etc.), like with Julianna Margulies in &lt;em&gt;The Good Wife&lt;/em&gt; or Jill Scott in &lt;em&gt;No. 1 Ladies Detective Agency&lt;/em&gt;: both shows address issues specific to their respective gender/race/class categories, but the show expands the story by fleshing them out as full characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question! I think a show like <em>HawthoRNe</em> provides a good example, a show that&#8217;s essentially a genre series (medical drama), but with a lead that&#8217;s a little &#8220;different.&#8221; Sci-fi is good at this, and I could imagine a doctor or lawyer show with a gay lead. Each episode would focus on a medical or legal problem, and the lead &#8220;just happens to be gay.&#8221; Of course sexuality would &#8212; and should! &#8212; come up, but the point is that you would identify with the character for other reasons (they&#8217;re empathetic, good at their jobs, fight for the little guy, etc.), like with Julianna Margulies in <em>The Good Wife</em> or Jill Scott in <em>No. 1 Ladies Detective Agency</em>: both shows address issues specific to their respective gender/race/class categories, but the show expands the story by fleshing them out as full characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miggy</title>
		<link>http://blog.ajchristian.org/2010/01/19/why-has-showtime-abandoned-gays-death-of-the-gay-show-part-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Miggy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.ajchristian.org/?p=1726#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Hey,

I&#039;ve read both your posts on this subject and I think they&#039;re incredibly well done.

The one question I was left with, and looking for your feedback on/ some enlightenment, is this: What does a show that &quot;[has] gay characters as leads, but on shows about other things (other than their sexuality)&quot; look like? Is it possible to have a show with a gay lead (as opposed to a bisexual lead) without making the lead&#039;s sexuality a big issue in the show?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read both your posts on this subject and I think they&#8217;re incredibly well done.</p>
<p>The one question I was left with, and looking for your feedback on/ some enlightenment, is this: What does a show that &#8220;[has] gay characters as leads, but on shows about other things (other than their sexuality)&#8221; look like? Is it possible to have a show with a gay lead (as opposed to a bisexual lead) without making the lead&#8217;s sexuality a big issue in the show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

